Twitter integrating the ReTweet

Twitter integrating the ReTweet

Twitter announced “Project Retweet” today, as the company is now officially working towards integrating a Retweet function directly into the Twitter service, website and API. Twitter plans to launch the feature in “a few weeks” and is currently working with developers to allow them to prepare for the new API features. This means that when the new feature actually does launch, your favorite 3rd party Twitter client such as Tweetdeck, Twidroid, etc, could already have the feature available.

Kudos to Twitter for integrating a feature that is highly desired and will be highly utilized by the community.

Twitter published the following image with their announcement, to give you an idea of what the integrated Retweet feature will look like.

In the image above, notice that the 2nd mock tweet from the top, by ev, is actually a retweet. Underneath, you’ll find the attribution, stating that it was retweeted by biz. So even if you’re not following ev, if you are following biz, you would get a tweet appearing in your stream that looks like it came from ev.

How will this affect the Twitter experience?

This might cause some mild confusion with the Twitter community on the initial rollout, but over the long run, it looks like it will be a great way to handle retweets. You’ll no longer have to crop/edit/squeeze the original tweet that you are retweeting, as the integrated retweet will take up the exact same amount of characters as the original tweet. No more losing precious tweet characters for “RT” or @username, the integrated retweet will be an identical replica of the original tweet, except with an added retweet attribution underneath, but not part of the actual tweet. Pretty freakin cool!

One question remains on how the original tweeter will actually see these new integrated retweets in their own stream. It would be a bit strange if you get a duplicate (re)tweet in your stream that looks like it came from yourself, but how else would you know when/if someone retweeted you?

What do you think about the upcoming integrated retweet?

Paypal adds new fees without notifying users


Last month, I transferred some funds to my friend Steven Kippel via Paypal. Shortly thereafter, he reported that Paypal had charged him a fee on the incoming funds. We both had no idea why.

Steven writes for one of my websites and I’ve been sending him funds monthly through Paypal for over 2 years. These fund transfers were always initiated from a personal Paypal account to another personal Paypal account, using funds from a Paypal account balance (not from a bank account or credit card). These transfers had always been free. Neither party had to pay any fees to send or receive the funds.

The experiment – verifying the new fees

We wanted to get to the bottom of the issue, so I contacted another friend, Jared Newman, to help perform a test. I sent him $1 classified as Purchase – Services. The Purchase tab also happens to be the default send payment option. It is the same way I had been sending funds for years that had never incurred a fee for transferring from a personal account to another personal account.

Jared received the entire $1 at that time, so we thought perhaps there was some problem or other snafu with Steven’s account. Not so. Later on, Jared reported back that Paypal had retroactively charged his account a fee (2.9% + 0.30) to receive the funds that I transferred. This is particularly disturbing because Paypal used to prompt you, asking whether or not you wish to accept a funds transfer if it was going to incur a fee. There is no such prompt for this type of fund transfer.

Jared then wrote about the fiasco on PCWorld. The story was then picked up by The Consumerist, Gadgetell and other websites.

Paypal’s public statement

Charlotte Hill, Paypal’s PR Manager, had this to say to PCWorld “We didn’t want to make a huge formal communication out of this pricing change, because we weren’t really adding any fees, and we were hoping it would be a more useful experience for people”.

You “weren’t really adding any fees” ? Really Paypal? I’ve been doing the same type of funds transfer every month for over 2 years and now when I do that same transfer, the recipient is charged 2.9% + 0.30. How is that not adding any new fees?? How is that a more useful experience?? The bottom line is, personal account Paypal users weren’t being charged for this type of fund transfer before and now they are. Paypal did not notify its users. Almost no one knew about it. Everyone I’ve talked to had no idea about the new fees until they were charged.

All this attention evoked an official blog post response from Paypal. Even so, their reply still didn’t fess up to the fact that they started charging for something that was previously free, without informing their users adequately. Sorry Paypal, but you screwed up. You have added new fees for personal accounts and you won’t even admit the change.

So even though you can avoid the fees and send funds for “free” using the Personal tab in Paypal, I’m still exploring alternatives due to their shady practices. Perhaps Revolution Money Exchange or Google Checkout?